<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Match.com Review (match)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lovesites.com/match/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lovesites.com/match</link>
	<description>Providing online dating service reviews, dating advice and tips for singles looking for love, dates and romance online.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NativeNYker</title>
		<link>http://www.lovesites.com/match/comment-page-1#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>NativeNYker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lovesites.com/56-match#comment-290</guid>
		<description>What a waste of money this was.  I&#039;ve had profiles setup on Match.com at two different times.  I was surprised to learn how much the fees had increased the second time around, but decided to give it a shot anyway.  All I can say is that I&#039;ll never create another profile using their services.  Match-by-mail was a joke.  Most of those &quot;matches&quot; were, in fact, no match at all for me as we had almost nothing in common.  In some instances, even the location requirements were way off.  In addition, as my premium membership was about to expire I was blanketed with e-mails about their sister site Chemistry.com, which is supposed to be an upscale version of Match.com.  Don&#039;t waste your time or money.  You&#039;d be better off at your local singles bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a waste of money this was.  I&#8217;ve had profiles setup on Match.com at two different times.  I was surprised to learn how much the fees had increased the second time around, but decided to give it a shot anyway.  All I can say is that I&#8217;ll never create another profile using their services.  Match-by-mail was a joke.  Most of those &#8220;matches&#8221; were, in fact, no match at all for me as we had almost nothing in common.  In some instances, even the location requirements were way off.  In addition, as my premium membership was about to expire I was blanketed with e-mails about their sister site Chemistry.com, which is supposed to be an upscale version of Match.com.  Don&#8217;t waste your time or money.  You&#8217;d be better off at your local singles bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
